Lawler reading discussion | Philosophy homework help
-This discussion is minimal team interaction & only takes a couple of days of your time: mostly for the reading.
Your team must POST to LAWLER topic. When you are all done, Team Lead should post at very bottom, within the LAWLER topic, the LAWLER RESULT for your team. There is no special Result topic to post the Lawler result.
DO NOT DUPLICATE the same Luddite passage in your discussion that other team members have presented.
This discussion is really broader than the reading of Lawler, for it involves the Marx/Engels readings. Lawler is offering the views of those who are against Democratic Liberation Theory, and Democratic Liberation Theory is a theory maintaining that technological innovation will bring true democracy, freeing workers from alienation. Study my NOTES for the Engels vision of a future tech world. You should discuss the question here below in blue:
In this article Lawler presents views of different anti-Democratic Liberation Theory thinkers (LUDDITES are anti- Democratic Liberation Theory thinkers) (see my notes for breakdown of LUDDITE views). Which of those different views do you find most flawed or most correct and why? Quote Lawler article please.
Each of you on the team should provide a short paragraph (1/3 to a half page, longer is okay, shorter will lose points) discussing one of the LUDDITE criticisms of Democratic Liberation Theory. In that paragraph, state what the Luddite criticism is and then say if you agree or not and explain why you agree or not. DO NOT DUPLICATE the same Luddite passage in your discussion that other team members have presented.
TEAM LEAD will copy/paste paragraphs of each member into one document.
Before the paragraph of each member, write in their name so I know who contributed that paragraph.
SHOULD LOOK LIKE THIS:
Team 6. LAWLER READING DISCUSSION
John Doe
Luddites view here. Agree or not. Why agree or not. Give some extra examples from life that reinforce your assessment. (1/3 to a half page) (Quote Lawler article please, but not more than one sentence: if you quote more then your paragraph should be more than half a page)
Mary Ray
Luddites view here. Agree or not. Why agree or not. Give some extra examples from life that reinforce your assessment. (1/3 to a half page) (Quote Lawler article please, but not more than one sentence: if you quote more then your paragraph should be more than half a page)
Susam Mi
Luddites view here. Agree or not. Why agree or not. Give some extra examples from life that reinforce your assessment. (1/3 to a half page) (Quote Lawler article please, but not more than one sentence: if you quote more then your paragraph should be more than half a page)
HINT: if you choose a passage you agree with, you must work much harder, giving examples that really grab attention, otherwise, your critique will sound dull, just head nodding. Better to look for passage or view you do not agree with & say why you do not agree.
